Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Superconducting Qubits
Emergent-Coupling-Based Ansatz Evaluated on a Superconducting Quantum Processor
arXiv
Authors: Alina Joch, Kevin Lively, Benedikt Fauseweh
Year
2026
Paper ID
38997
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
145
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The performance of the variational quantum eigensolver depends critically on the choice of ansatz. In this work, we experimentally evaluate the emergent-coupling-based ansatz (ECBA), a physically motivated variational ansatz for disordered systems. The ECBA is based on a renormalization (semi-)group approach to determine the dominant effective couplings, resulting in shallow circuits that capture the essential long-range entanglement structure while balancing local correlations. We implement the ECBA on superconducting quantum processors and benchmark it on disordered Heisenberg chain models. Using classically pre-optimized parameters and error mitigation techniques, we study systems of up to 30 qubits and observe an experimental relative energy accuracy of 96.47% for the largest system. Furthermore, we find that the ECBA can be efficiently embedded on hardware with two-dimensional square-lattice connectivity. We compare to commonly used hardware efficient ansätze and observe that the ECBA achieves significantly higher accuracy at a similar gate count.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.