Quick Navigation
Topics
Qldpc Advanced Quantum Codes
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
Asymptotically good CSS codes that realize the logical transversal Clifford group fault-tolerantly
arXiv
Authors: K. Sai Mineesh Reddy, Navin Kashyap
Year
2026
Paper ID
3898
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
96
Citations
N/A
Abstract
This paper introduces a framework for constructing Calderbank-Shor-Steane (CSS) codes that support fault-tolerant logical transversal Z-rotations. Using this framework, we obtain asymptotically good CSS codes that fault-tolerantly realize the logical transversal Clifford group. Furthermore, investigating CSS-T codes, we: (a) demonstrate asymptotically good CSS-T codes wherein the transversal T realizes the logical transversal Sdagger; (b) show that the condition C2 ast C1 subseteq C1perp is necessary but not sufficient for CSS-T codes; and (c) revise the characterizations of CSS-T codes wherein the transversal T implements the logical identity and the logical transversal T, respectively.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Error Correction & Fault Tolerance research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- This paper introduces a framework for constructing Calderbank-Shor-Steane (CSS) codes that support fault-tolerant logical transversal Z-rotations.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.