Quick Navigation

Topics

Qldpc Advanced Quantum Codes Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance

Asymptotically good CSS codes that realize the logical transversal Clifford group fault-tolerantly

arXiv
Authors: K. Sai Mineesh Reddy, Navin Kashyap

Year

2026

Paper ID

3898

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

96

Citations

N/A

Abstract

This paper introduces a framework for constructing Calderbank-Shor-Steane (CSS) codes that support fault-tolerant logical transversal Z-rotations. Using this framework, we obtain asymptotically good CSS codes that fault-tolerantly realize the logical transversal Clifford group. Furthermore, investigating CSS-T codes, we: (a) demonstrate asymptotically good CSS-T codes wherein the transversal T realizes the logical transversal Sdagger; (b) show that the condition C2 ast C1 subseteq C1perp is necessary but not sufficient for CSS-T codes; and (c) revise the characterizations of CSS-T codes wherein the transversal T implements the logical identity and the logical transversal T, respectively.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Error Correction & Fault Tolerance research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • This paper introduces a framework for constructing Calderbank-Shor-Steane (CSS) codes that support fault-tolerant logical transversal Z-rotations.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #3898 #68397 Optimizing Parallel Execution o...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.