You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Machine Learning
Quantum Foundations
Higgs Boson Spookiness: Probing Quantum Nonlocality with Spacetime-Resolved H→τ^+τ^- Decays
arXiv
Authors: Lawrence Lee, John Lawless, Caroline Riggall
Year
2026
Paper ID
38971
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
132
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We demonstrate that a future precision ee Higgs factory would be able to perform a spacetime-resolved test of quantum nonlocality in Higgs boson decays. In simulated ee→ ZH → (μμ)(ττ) events at sqrt{s}=240 GeV, we reconstruct τ lepton decay vertices and measure spin correlations as a function of the spacetime interval between the two τ decays. Such a measurement would be able to test Bell-inequality-violating correlations for spacelike-separated decays, enabling direct exclusion of superluminal, finite-speed entanglement signaling theories. With 0.75 ab-1 of integrated luminosity, entanglement signal propagation speeds below approx2c can be excluded at 95\% CL. Signals establishing any spin correlation can be excluded for speeds below approx9c. This constitutes the first proposed spacetime-resolved measurement of electroweak quantum entanglement at a particle collider and demonstrates a unique capability of future Higgs factories.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We demonstrate that a future precision ee Higgs factory would be able to perform a spacetime-resolved test of quantum nonlocality in Higgs boson decays.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.