Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Query Learning Nearly Pauli Sparse Unitaries in Diamond Distance
arXiv
Authors: Zahra Honjani, Mohsen Heidari
Year
2026
Paper ID
38912
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
221
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study the problem of learning nearly (s,ε)-sparse unitaries, meaning that the Pauli spectrum is concentrated on at most s components with at most ε residual mass in Pauli ell1-norm. This class generalizes well-studied families, including sparse unitaries, quantum k-juntas, 2k-Pauli dimensional channels, and compositions of depth O\(loglog n\) circuits with near-Clifford circuits. Given query access to an unknown nearly sparse unitary U, our goal is to efficiently (both in time and query complexity) construct a quantum channel that is close in diamond distance to U. We design a learning algorithm achieving this guarantee using {O}\(s6/ε4\) forward queries to U, and running time polynomial in relevant parameters. A key contribution is an efficient quantum algorithm that, given query access to an arbitrary unknown unitary U, estimates all Pauli coefficients (up to a shared global phase) whose magnitude exceeds a given threshold θ, extending existing sparse recovery techniques to general unitaries. We also study the broader class of unitaries with bounded Pauli ell1-norm. For that class, we prove an exponential query lower bound Ω\(2n/2\). We introduce a more relaxed accuracy metric which is the diamond distance restricted to a set of input states. Then, we show that, under this metric, unitaries with Pauli ell1-norm uniformly bounded by L1 are learnable with {O}\(L18/ε16\).
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study the problem of learning nearly (s,ε)-sparse unitaries, meaning that the Pauli spectrum is concentrated on at most s components with at most ε residual mass in Pauli...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.