Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Quantum Chemistry

Efficient Auxiliary-Field Quantum Monte Carlo using Isometric Tensor Hypercontraction

arXiv
Authors: Maxine Luo, Victor Chen, Yu Wang, Christian B. Mendl

Year

2026

Paper ID

38866

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

141

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Auxiliary Field Quantum Monte Carlo (AFQMC) has emerged as a powerful framework for treating strongly correlated electronic systems, offering a favorable balance between computational cost and accuracy. In this paper, we present a novel AFQMC method that uses the isometric tensor hypercontraction (ITHC) technique to diagonalize the two-body Coulomb interaction of molecular electronic Hamiltonians by introducing additional fictitious fermionic modes. Our method shows reduced theoretical complexity and better practical performance for both propagation and local energy evaluation compared to the standard AFQMC method. We demonstrate the efficacy of this approach by computing the ground-state energies of a linear $\ce{H10}$-chain and the benzene molecule. Our results show that the extended-basis AFQMC recovers many-body correlations with a precision comparable to that of high-level wavefunction methods such as Coupled Clusters (CC) or Density Matrix Renormalization Group (DMRG), while offering significantly improved scaling.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #38866 #67340 Ultra-sensitive solid-state org... #67337 Parameterization and optimizabi... #67360 Quadrupolar resonance spectrosc... #67353 Operational Framework for a Qua...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.