You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Machine Learning
Quantum Algorithms for Gibbs Expectation of Non-log-concave and Heavy-tailed Distributions
arXiv
Authors: Xinmiao Li, Jin-Peng Liu
Year
2026
Paper ID
38814
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
165
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We establish a systematic framework of unbiased quantum sampling and estimation protocols for the classical Gibbs expectation. This framework generalizes existing approaches to the partition function estimation and has broader applications in various fields. We consider sampling and estimation for a wide class of non-log-concave distributions, particularly heavy-tailed ones, under relaxed assumptions beyond strong convexity, such as dissipativity. We develop an unbiased extension of quantum-accelerated multilevel Monte Carlo (QA-MLMC) to eliminate all biases from discretization and time truncation, together with introducing a change-of-measure approach and the Girsanov theorem via Radon-Nikodym derivatives. As a result, our approach achieves quantum complexity widetilde{mathcal{O}}\(ε-1\) within error ε, whereas the classical MLMC requires widetilde{mathcal{O}}\(ε-2\) and existing quantum algorithms yield biased estimators under stronger assumptions. Furthermore, our unified framework enables unbiased quantum sampling and estimation for certain heavy-tailed distributions after transformation. We provide several concrete applications of our approach in statistics, machine learning, and finance, towards more practical scenarios of the quantum acceleration of stochastic processes.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We establish a systematic framework of unbiased quantum sampling and estimation protocols for the classical Gibbs expectation.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.