Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Optimization
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
Geometry-induced correlated noise in qLDPC syndrome extraction
arXiv
Authors: Angelo Di Bella
Year
2026
Paper ID
38751
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
152
Citations
N/A
Abstract
With code and syndrome-extraction schedule fixed, can routed geometry alone change the correlated fault model enough to impact logical performance? Starting from a geometry-conditioned same-tick interaction Hamiltonian, we derive a controlled retained single-and-pair data-fault model for bivariate-bicycle (BB) layouts. Two geometry metrics emerge in two kernel regimes: under a crossing-local diagnostic kernel, a matching argument reduces the support-level effective fault weight; when every support pair appears in at least one retained round with finite same-round separation, strictly positive kernels saturate the support graph, and weighted exposure becomes the discriminating quantity. Circuit-level Monte Carlo on the [[72, 12, 6]] and [[144, 12, 12]] benchmarks confirms that a biplanar bounded-thickness layout suppresses the monomial single-layer embedding penalty, with weighted exposure tracking logical error rate across 101 operating points (Spearman correlation 0.893). A single-layer logical-family optimization on BB72 reduces worst-case exposure by 26.11% and lowers logical error rate in the tested power-law window. Routed geometry should be optimized together with code, schedule, and decoder.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Error Correction & Fault Tolerance research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- With code and syndrome-extraction schedule fixed, can routed geometry alone change the correlated fault model enough to impact logical performance?
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.