Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Distilling Unitary Operations: A No-Go Theorem and Minimal Realization
arXiv
Authors: Jiayi Zhao, Yu-Ao Chen, Guocheng Zhen, Chengkai Zhu, Ranyiliu Chen, Xin Wang
Year
2026
Paper ID
38750
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
185
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum gates executed on physical hardware are inevitably degraded by environmental noise. While state purification effectively distills static quantum resources, the dynamic execution of quantum algorithms requires a higher-order approach to mitigate errors on the operations themselves. In this work, we investigate unitary purification: the task of utilizing a quantum higher-order operation to partially restore the ideal action of an unknown unitary corrupted by a known noise model. Focusing on canonical depolarizing noise, we first reveal a fundamental operational obstruction. We prove that within the indefinite causal order framework, no nontrivial 2-slot higher-order operation can universally purify the set of single-qubit unitaries. Overcoming this strict limitation, we establish that a 3-slot architecture provides the minimal realization for non-trivial universal purification. We analytically derive the optimal average fidelity for the 3-slot regime, demonstrating that it strictly surpasses trivial strategies by systematically utilizing ancillary qubits as a quantum memory to absorb errors. Furthermore, we provide a concrete quantum circuit construction for this optimal higher-order operation. Our results establish the strict theoretical boundaries of distilling clean operations from noisy gates, offering immediate architectural insights for robust gate design.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum gates executed on physical hardware are inevitably degraded by environmental noise.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.