Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
Six-dimensional state-to-state quantum differential cross sections for the F + CH4 → HF + CH3 reaction.
PubMed
Authors: Wang J, Liu S, Zhang DH
Year
2026
Paper ID
38655
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
86
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Using the time-dependent wave packet method based on the multiple-step reactant-product decoupling scheme in conjunction with a free-torsion six-dimensional model, we calculate the state-to-state quantum differential cross sections for the F + CH4 → HF + CH3 reaction on a highly accurate neural network PES at collision energies ranging from threshold up to 0.1 eV. The product vibrational and rotational state distributions, angular distributions, and energy partitioning information are analyzed, yielding quantitative agreement with available experimental results. The influences of reaction resonances and collision energy are also discussed in detail.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Using the time-dependent wave packet method based on the multiple-step reactant-product decoupling scheme in conjunction with a free-torsion six-dimensional model, we calculate...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.