Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Non-perturbative CPMG scaling and qutrit-driven breakdown under compiled superconducting-qubit control: a single-qubit study
arXiv
Authors: Jun Ye
Year
2026
Paper ID
38614
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
159
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Decoherence in superconducting qubits emerges from the interplay of multilevel dynamics and structured environmental noise, yet perturbative models cannot capture all resulting signatures. Here, EmuPlat couples instruction-set-architecture-level waveform generation to the hierarchical equations of motion (HEOM) under 1/f non-Markovian pure dephasing. In the resulting non-perturbative regime - where filter-function predictions become quantitatively uninformative - CPMG scaling of a three-level superconducting transmon yields one calibration result, two physical findings, and one structural null. Y-CPMG exhibits axis-dependent scaling-law breakdown - non-monotonic decoherence, partial coherence revival, and pronounced X--Y population asymmetry (0.204 vs {<} 0.01) - driven by third-level anharmonicity amplified by bath memory; X-CPMG maintains well-behaved power-law scaling with a finite-n transient excess consistent with non-Markovian bath-memory effects. The structural null is equally informative: waveform-level differences - Standard versus VPPU realizations - remain undetectable across all coupling strengths, establishing that rotating-frame pure-dephasing coupling renders control-layer detail invisible to scaling observables. These findings define testable predictions, the most experimentally accessible requiring only qualitative verification.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Decoherence in superconducting qubits emerges from the interplay of multilevel dynamics and structured environmental noise, yet perturbative models cannot capture all resulting...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.