Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Limited Parallelization in Gate Operations Leads to Higher Space Overhead and Lower Noise Threshold
arXiv
Authors: Sai Sanjay Narayanan, Smita Bagewadi, Avhishek Chatterjee
Year
2024
Paper ID
38464
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
198
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In a modern error corrected quantum memory or circuit, parallelization of gate operations is severely restricted due to issues like cross-talk. Hence, there are enough idle qubits not undergoing gate operations either during the computation phase or during the error correction phase, which suffer further decoherence while waiting. Thus, in reality, the space overhead and the noise threshold would depend on the level of gate parallelization. In this paper, we obtain an analytical lower bound on the required space overhead in terms of the level of parallelization for an error correction framework that has more error correction capability than the existing ones. We consider two types of errors: i.i.d. erasure and depolarization. In comparison to the known lower bounds which assume full gate parallelization, our bound is provably strictly larger despite allowing more capability to the error correction framework. This shows the steep price to be paid for lack of gate parallelization. An implication of the bound is that the noise or decoherence threshold, i.e., the noise beyond which no fault-tolerant memory or circuit can be realized, vanishes if the number of parallel gate operations does not scale linearly with the number of physical qubits.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In a modern error corrected quantum memory or circuit, parallelization of gate operations is severely restricted due to issues like cross-talk.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.