You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Bounds for Revised Unambiguous Discrimination Tasks of Quantum Resources
arXiv
Authors: Xian Shi
Year
2024
Paper ID
38439
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
109
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum state discrimination is a fundamental task that is meaningful in quantum information theory. In this manuscript, we consider a revised unambiguous discrimination of quantum resources. First, we present an upper bound of the success probability for a revised unambiguous discrimination task in the unasymptotic and asymptotic scenarios. Next, we generalize the task from quantum states to quantum channels. We present an upper bound of the success probability for the task under the adaptive strategy. Furthermore, we show the bound can be computed efficiently. Finally, compared with the classical unambiguous discrimination, we show the advantage of the quantum by considering a quantifier on a set of semidefinite positive operators.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum state discrimination is a fundamental task that is meaningful in quantum information theory.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.