Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Experimental realization of direct entangling gates between dual-type qubits

arXiv
Authors: Chenxi Wang, Chuanxin Huang, Hongxuan Zhang, Hongyuan Hu, Zhichao Mao, Panyu Hou, Yukai Wu, Zichao Zhou, Luming Duan

Year

2024

Paper ID

38386

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

127

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Dual-type qubits have become a promising way to suppress the crosstalk error of auxiliary operations in large-scale ion trap quantum computation. Here we demonstrate a direct entangling gate between dual-type qubits encoded in the S1/2 and D5/2 hyperfine manifolds of 137Ba+ ions. Our scheme is economic in the hardware, requiring only a single 532 nm laser system to entangle both qubit types by driving their Raman transitions. We achieve a Bell state fidelity of 96.3(4)\% for the dual-type Molmer-Sorensen gate between an S-D ion pair, comparable to that for the same-type S-S or D-D gates. This technique can reduce the overhead for back-and-forth conversions between dual-type qubits in the quantum circuit with wide applications in quantum error correction and ion-photon quantum networks.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Dual-type qubits have become a promising way to suppress the crosstalk error of auxiliary operations in large-scale ion trap quantum computation.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #38386

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.