Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Superconducting Qubits
Towards a benchmark for quantum computers based on an iterated post-selective protocol
arXiv
Authors: Adrian Ortega, Orsolya Kálmán, Tamás Kiss
Year
2024
Paper ID
38312
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
184
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Applying post selection in each step of an iterated protocol leads to sensitive quantum dynamics that may be utilized to test and benchmark current quantum computers. An example of this type of protocols was originally proposed for the task of matching an unknown quantum state to a reference state. We propose to employ the quantum state matching protocol for the purpose of testing and benchmarking quantum computers. In particular, we implement this scheme on freely available IBM superconducting quantum computers. By comparing measured values with the theoretical conditional probability of the single, final post-selected qubit, which is easy to calculate classically, we define a benchmark metric. Additionally, the standard deviation of the experimental results from their average serves as a secondary benchmark metric, characterizing fluctuations in the given device. A peculiar feature of the considered protocol is that there is a phase parameter of the initially prepared state, on which the resulting conditional probability should not depend. A careful analysis of the measured values indicates that its dependence on the initial phase can reveal useful information about coherent gate errors of the quantum device.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Applying post selection in each step of an iterated protocol leads to sensitive quantum dynamics that may be utilized to test and benchmark current quantum computers.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.