Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Inequality constraints in variational quantum circuits with qudits
arXiv
Authors: Alberto Bottarelli, Sebastian Schmitt, Philipp Hauke
Year
2024
Paper ID
38289
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
160
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum optimization is emerging as a prominent candidate for exploiting the capabilities of near-term quantum devices. Many application-relevant optimization tasks require the inclusion of inequality constraints, usually handled by enlarging the Hilbert space through the addition of slack variables. This approach, however, requires significant additional resources especially when considering multiple constraints. Here, we study an alternative direct implementation of these constraints within the QAOA algorithm, achieved using qudit-SUM gates, and compare it to the slack variable method generalized to qudits. We benchmark these approaches on three paradigmatic optimization problems. We find that the direct implementation of the inequality penalties vastly outperforms the slack variables method, especially when studying real-world inspired problems with many constraints. Within the direct penalty implementation, a linear energy penalty for unfeasible states outperforms other investigated functional forms, such as the canonical quadratic penalty. The proposed approach may thus be an enabling step for approaching realistic industry-scale and fundamental science problems with large numbers of inequality constraints.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum optimization is emerging as a prominent candidate for exploiting the capabilities of near-term quantum devices.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.