Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Single-copy stabilizer testing
arXiv
Authors: Marcel Hinsche, Jonas Helsen
Year
2024
Paper ID
38266
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
181
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We consider the problem of testing whether an unknown n-qubit quantum state |ψrangle is a stabilizer state, with only single-copy access. We give an algorithm solving this problem using O(n) copies, and conversely prove that Ω\(sqrt{n}\) copies are required for any algorithm. The main observation behind our algorithm is that when repeatedly measuring in a randomly chosen stabilizer basis, stabilizer states are the most likely among the set of all pure states to exhibit linear dependencies in measurement outcomes. Our algorithm is designed to probe deviations from this extremal behavior. For the lower bound, we first reduce stabilizer testing to the task of distinguishing random stabilizer states from the maximally mixed state. We then argue that, without loss of generality, it is sufficient to consider measurement strategies that a) lie in the commutant of the tensor action of the Clifford group and b) satisfy a Positive Partial Transpose (PPT) condition. By leveraging these constraints, together with novel results on the partial transposes of the generators of the Clifford commutant, we derive the lower bound on the sample complexity.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We consider the problem of testing whether an unknown n-qubit quantum state |ψrangle is a stabilizer state, with only single-copy access.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.