!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Channels Communication Theory
Quantum graphs of homomorphisms
arXiv
Authors: Andre Kornell, Bert Lindenhovius
Year
2026
Paper ID
3821
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
144
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We introduce a category mathsf{qGph} of quantum graphs, whose definition is motivated entirely from noncommutative geometry. For all quantum graphs G and H in mathsf{qGph}, we then construct a quantum graph [G,H] of homomorphisms from G to H, making mathsf{qGph} a closed symmetric monoidal category. We prove that for all finite graphs G and H, the quantum graph [G,H] is nonempty iff the (G,H)-homomorphism game has a winning quantum strategy, directly generalizing the classical case. The finite quantum graphs in mathsf{qGph} are tracial, real, and self-adjoint, and the morphisms between them are CP morphisms that are adjoint to a unital *-homomorphism. We prove that Weaver's two notions of a CP morphism coincide in this context. We also include a short proof that every finite reflexive quantum graph is the confusability quantum graph of a quantum channel.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Channels & Communication Theory research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We introduce a category mathsfqGph of quantum graphs, whose definition is motivated entirely from noncommutative geometry.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.