Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

How to Construct Random Unitaries

arXiv
Authors: Fermi Ma, Hsin-Yuan Huang

Year

2024

Paper ID

38165

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

130

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The existence of pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs) - efficient quantum circuits that are computationally indistinguishable from Haar-random unitaries - has been a central open question, with significant implications for cryptography, complexity theory, and fundamental physics. In this work, we close this question by proving that PRUs exist, assuming that any quantum-secure one-way function exists. We establish this result for both (1) the standard notion of PRUs, which are secure against any efficient adversary that makes queries to the unitary U, and (2) a stronger notion of PRUs, which are secure even against adversaries that can query both the unitary U and its inverse Udagger. In the process, we prove that any algorithm that makes queries to a Haar-random unitary can be efficiently simulated on a quantum computer, up to inverse-exponential trace distance.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The existence of pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs) - efficient quantum circuits that are computationally indistinguishable from Haar-random unitaries - has been a central open...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #38165

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.