Quick Navigation

Topics

Superconducting Qubits

Complementing the transmon by integrating a geometric shunt inductor

arXiv
Authors: Simone D. Fasciati, Boris Shteynas, Giulio Campanaro, Mustafa Bakr, Shuxiang Cao, Vivek Chidambaram, James Wills, Peter J. Leek

Year

2024

Paper ID

38152

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

85

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We realize a single-Josephson-junction transmon qubit shunted by a simple geometric inductor. We couple it capacitively to a conventional transmon and show that the ZZ interaction between the two qubits is completely suppressed when they are flux-biased to have opposite-sign anharmonicities. Away from the flux sweet spot of the inductively-shunted transmon, we demonstrate fast two-qubit interactions using first-order sideband transitions. The simplicity of this two-qubit-species circuit makes it promising for building large lattices of superconducting qubits with low coherent error and a rich gate set.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We realize a single-Josephson-junction transmon qubit shunted by a simple geometric inductor.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #38152 #69595 Tantalum as a base material for... #69543 Quantum Information Geometry of... #69536 Quantum Algorithm for Open-Syst... #69534 Readout-Induced Leakage in Supe...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.