Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations

Super-activating quantum memory by entanglement-breaking channels

arXiv
Authors: Gelo Noel M. Tabia, Chung-Yun Hsieh

Year

2024

Paper ID

38005

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

119

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Entanglement is an essential resource for various quantum-information tasks. When a target system shares entanglement with another memory system and is stored reliably, one can use entanglement at a later time - this is quantum memory. In practice, entanglement can be exceedingly fragile during a system's evolution. In particular, no entanglement can survive when a so-called entanglement-breaking channel acts on the target system. Are entanglement-breaking channels really useless for maintaining entanglement? As a single channel, this is certainly the case; it cannot be useful for quantum memory. However, in this work, we show that putting together two entanglement-breaking channels in a broadcasting scenario can activate their ability to maintain entanglement - the channel's quantum memory resource can be super-activated.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Entanglement is an essential resource for various quantum-information tasks.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #38005

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.