Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Predicting adaptively chosen observables in quantum systems
arXiv
Authors: Jerry Huang, Laura Lewis, Hsin-Yuan Huang, John Preskill
Year
2024
Paper ID
37892
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
156
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Recent advances have demonstrated that mathcal{O}\(log M\) measurements suffice to predict M properties of arbitrarily large quantum many-body systems. However, these remarkable findings assume that the properties to be predicted are chosen independently of the data. This assumption can be violated in practice, where scientists adaptively select properties after looking at previous predictions. This work investigates the adaptive setting for three classes of observables: local, Pauli, and bounded-Frobenius-norm observables. We prove that Ω\(sqrt{M}\) samples of an arbitrarily large unknown quantum state are necessary to predict expectation values of M adaptively chosen local and Pauli observables. We also present computationally-efficient algorithms that achieve this information-theoretic lower bound. In contrast, for bounded-Frobenius-norm observables, we devise an algorithm requiring only mathcal{O}\(log M\) samples, independent of system size. Our results highlight the potential pitfalls of adaptivity in analyzing data from quantum experiments and provide new algorithmic tools to safeguard against erroneous predictions in quantum experiments.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Recent advances have demonstrated that mathcalO(log M) measurements suffice to predict M properties of arbitrarily large quantum many-body systems.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.