You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Optimization
Quantum Simulation
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Monogamy of Entanglement Bounds and Improved Approximation Algorithms for Qudit Hamiltonians
arXiv
Authors: Zackary Jorquera, Alexandra Kolla, Steven Kordonowy, Juspreet Singh Sandhu, Stuart Wayland
Year
2024
Paper ID
37890
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
143
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We prove new monogamy of entanglement bounds for two-local qudit Hamiltonians of rank-one projectors without one-local terms. In particular, we certify the ground state energy in terms of the maximum matching of the underlying interaction graph via low-degree sum-of-squares proofs. Algorithmically, we show that a simple matching-based algorithm approximates the ground state energy to at least 1/d for general graphs and to at least 1/d + Θ(1/D) for graphs with bounded degree, D. This outperforms random assignment, which, in expectation, achieves energy of only 1/d2 of the ground state energy for general graphs. Notably, on D-regular graphs with degree, D leq 5, and for any local dimension, d, we show that this simple matching-based algorithm has an approximation guarantee of 1/2. Lastly, when d=2, we present an algorithm achieving an approximation guarantee of 0.595, beating that of [PT22, arXiv:2206.08342] (which gave a tight approximation guarantee of 1/2).
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We prove new monogamy of entanglement bounds for two-local qudit Hamiltonians of rank-one projectors without one-local terms.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.