Quick Navigation
Topics
Photonic Quantum Computing
Boosted Bell-state measurements for photonic quantum computation
arXiv
Authors: Nico Hauser, Matthias J. Bayerbach, Simone E. D'Aurelio, Raphael Weber, Matteo Santandrea, Shreya P. Kumar, Ish Dhand, Stefanie Barz
Year
2024
Paper ID
37839
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
159
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Fault-tolerant fusion-based photonic quantum computing (FBQC) greatly relies on entangling two-photon measurements, called fusions. These fusions can be realized using linear-optical projective Bell-state measurements (BSMs). These linear-optical BSMs are limited to a success probability of 50%, greatly reducing the performance of FBQC schemes. To improve the performance of FBQC architectures, a boosted BSM scheme taking advantage of ancillary entangled photon pairs and a 4x4 multiport interferometer has been proposed. This scheme allows the success probability to be increased up to 75%. In this work, we experimentally demonstrate this boosted BSM by using two Sagnac photon-pair sources and a fibre-based 4x4 multiport beam splitter. A boosted BSM success probability of \(69.3pm0.3\)\% has been achieved, exceeding the 50% limit. Furthermore, based on our BSMs, we calculate photon-loss thresholds for a fusion network using encoded six-ring resource states. We show that with this boosted BSM scheme an individual photon loss probability of 1.4% can be tolerated, while the non-boosted BSM leads to a photon-loss threshold of 0.45%.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Photonic Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Fault-tolerant fusion-based photonic quantum computing (FBQC) greatly relies on entangling two-photon measurements, called fusions.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.