Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Runtime Reduction in Linear Quantum Charge-Coupled Devices using the Parity Flow Formalism
arXiv
Authors: Federico DomÃnguez, Michael Fellner, Berend Klaver, Stefan Rombouts, Christian Ertler, Wolfgang Lechner
Year
2024
Paper ID
37838
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
138
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Using the Parity Flow formalism, we show that physical SWAP gates can be eliminated in linear hardware architectures, without increasing the total number of two-qubit operations. This has a significant impact on the execution time of quantum circuits in linear Quantum Charge-Coupled Devices (QCCDs), where SWAP gates are implemented by physically changing the position of the ions. Because SWAP gates are one of the most time-consuming operations in QCCDs, our scheme considerably reduces the runtime of the quantum Fourier transform and the quantum approximate optimization algorithm on all-to-all spin models, compared to circuits generated with standard compilers (TKET and Qiskit). While increasing the problem size (and therefore the number of qubits) typically demands longer runtimes, which are constrained by coherence time, our runtime reduction enables a significant increase in the number of qubits at a given coherence time.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Using the Parity Flow formalism, we show that physical SWAP gates can be eliminated in linear hardware architectures, without increasing the total number of two-qubit operations.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.