Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Device Fabrication Process Engineering
Comments on the holographic description of Narain theories
arXiv
Authors: Anatoly Dymarsky, Alfred Shapere
Year
2020
Paper ID
378
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
191
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We discuss the holographic description of Narain U(1)ctimes U(1)c conformal field theories, and their potential similarity to conventional weakly coupled gravity in the bulk, in the sense that the effective IR bulk description includes "U(1) gravity" amended with additional light degrees of freedom. Starting from this picture, we formulate the hypothesis that in the large central charge limit the density of states of any Narain theory is bounded by below by the density of states of U(1) gravity. This immediately implies that the maximal value of the spectral gap for primary fields is Δ1=c/(2πe). To test the self-consistency of this proposal, we study its implications using chiral lattice CFTs and CFTs based on quantum stabilizer codes. First we notice that the conjecture yields a new bound on quantum stabilizer codes, which is compatible with previously known bounds in the literature. We proceed to discuss the variance of the density of states, which for consistency must be vanishingly small in the large-c limit. We consider ensembles of code and chiral theories and show that in both cases the density variance is exponentially small in the central charge.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Device Fabrication & Process Engineering research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We discuss the holographic description of Narain U(1)^ctimes U(1)^c conformal field theories, and their potential similarity to conventional weakly coupled gravity in the bulk...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.