Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
Coherence Limits in Interference-Based cos2$varphi$ Qubits
arXiv
Authors: S. Messelot, A. Leblanc, J. -S. Tettekpoe, F. Lefloch, Q. Ficheux, J. Renard, É. Dumur
Year
2026
Paper ID
3777
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
172
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We investigate the coherence properties of parity-protected cos\(2varphi\) qubits based on interferences between two Josephson elements in a superconducting loop. We show that qubit implementations of a cos\(2varphi\) potential using a single loop, such as those employing semiconducting junctions, rhombus circuits, flowermon and KITE structures, can be described by the same Hamiltonian as two multi-harmonic Josephson junctions in a SQUID geometry. We find that, despite the parity protection arising from the suppression of single Cooper pair tunneling, there exists a fundamental trade-off between charge and flux noise dephasing channels. Using numerical simulations, we examine how relaxation and dephasing rates depend on external flux and circuit parameters, and we identify the best compromise for maximum coherence. With currently existing circuit parameters, the qubit lifetime T1 can exceed milliseconds while the dephasing time Tvarphi remains limited to only a few microseconds due to either flux or charge noise. Our findings establish practical limits on the coherence of this class of qubits and raise questions about the long-term potential of this approach.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We investigate the coherence properties of parity-protected cos(2varphi) qubits based on interferences between two Josephson elements in a superconducting loop.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.