Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Quantum Thermodynamics

Cooling limits of coherent refrigerators

arXiv
Authors: Rodolfo R. Soldati, Durga B. R. Dasari, Jörg Wrachtrup, Eric Lutz

Year

2024

Paper ID

37742

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

105

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Refrigeration limits are of fundamental and practical importance. We here show that quantum systems can be cooled below existing incoherent cooling bounds by employing coherent virtual qubits, even if the amount of coherence is incompletely known. Virtual subsystems, that do not necessarily correspond to a natural eigensubspace of a system, are a key conceptual tool in quantum information science and quantum thermodynamics. We derive universal coherent cooling limits and introduce specific protocols to reach them. As an illustration, we propose a generalized algorithmic cooling protocol that outperforms its current incoherent counterpart. Our results provide a general framework to investigate the performance of coherent refrigeration processes.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Thermodynamics research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Refrigeration limits are of fundamental and practical importance.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #37742 #69912 Spectral and thermodynamic prop... #69909 Fundamental Irreversibility fro...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.