Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
How to correct Ehrenfest nonadiabatic dynamics in open quantum systems: Ehrenfest plus random force (E+σ) dynamics
arXiv
Authors: Jingqi Chen, Joonho Lee, Wenjie Dou
Year
2024
Paper ID
37726
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
146
Citations
N/A
Abstract
One key challenge in the study of nonadiabatic dynamics in open quantum systems is to balance computational efficiency and accuracy. Although Ehrenfest dynamics (ED) is computationally efficient and well-suited for large complex systems, ED often yields inaccurate results. To address these limitations, we improve the accuracy of the traditional ED by adding a random force (E+σ). In this work, the construction of random forces is considered in Markovian and non-Markovian scenarios, and we ensure the dynamics satisfy the detailed balance in both scenarios. By comparing our E+σ with existing methods such as the electronic friction model and surface hopping, we furthermore validate its reliability. In addition, E+σ model still retains the high efficiency of the ED and does not incur much additional computation. We believe that this method provides an alternative to accurately describe mixed quantum-classical dynamics in open quantum systems, particularly for large complex systems.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- One key challenge in the study of nonadiabatic dynamics in open quantum systems is to balance computational efficiency and accuracy.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.