Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Comparative study of quantum methods in the resolution of track findings instances
arXiv
Authors: Duy Dao Do, Hervé Kerivin, Philippe Lacomme, Bogdan Vulpescu
Year
2024
Paper ID
37716
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
147
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Track finding can be considered as a complex optimization problem initially introduced in particle physics involving the reconstruction of particle trajectories. A track is typically composed of several consecutive segments (track segments) that resembles a smooth curve without bifurcations. In this paper various modeling approaches are explored in order to assess both their impact and their effectiveness in solving them using quantum and classical methods. We present implementations of three classical models using CPLEX, two quantum models running on actual D-Wave quantum computers, and one quantum model on a D-Wave simulator. To facilitate a fair comparative study and encourage future research in this area, we introduce a new set of benchmark instances, categorized into small, medium, and large scales. Our evaluation of these methods on the benchmark instances indicates that D-Wave methods offer an excellent balance between computation time and result quality, outperforming CPLEX in numerous cases.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Track finding can be considered as a complex optimization problem initially introduced in particle physics involving the reconstruction of particle trajectories.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.