Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
Precision test of statistical dynamics with state-to-state ultracold chemistry
arXiv
Authors: Yu Liu, Ming-Guang Hu, Matthew A. Nichols, Dongzheng Yang, Daiqian Xie, Hua Guo, Kang-Kuen Ni
Year
2020
Paper ID
377
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
174
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Chemical reactions represent a class of quantum problems that challenge both the current theoretical understanding and computational capabilities. Reactions that occur at ultralow temperatures provide an ideal testing ground for quantum chemistry and scattering theories, as they can be experimentally studied with unprecedented control, yet display dynamics that are highly complex. Here, we report the full product state distribution for the reaction 2KRb → K2 + Rb2. Ultracold preparation of the reactants grants complete control over their initial quantum degrees of freedom, while state-resolved, coincident detection of both products enables the measurement of scattering probabilities into all 57 allowed rotational state-pairs. Our results show an overall agreement with a state-counting model based on statistical theory, but also reveal several deviating state-pairs. In particular, we observe a strong suppression of population in the state-pair closest to the exoergicity limit, which we precisely determine to be 9.7711+0.0007-0.0005 cm-1, as a result of the long-range potential inhibiting the escape of products. The completeness of our measurements provides a valuable benchmark for quantum dynamics calculations beyond the current state-of-the-art.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Chemical reactions represent a class of quantum problems that challenge both the current theoretical understanding and computational capabilities.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.