Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Sample-Optimal Quantum Estimators for Pure-State Trace Distance and Fidelity via Samplizer
arXiv
Authors: Qisheng Wang, Zhicheng Zhang
Year
2024
Paper ID
37569
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
170
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Trace distance and infidelity (induced by square root fidelity), as basic measures of the closeness of quantum states, are commonly used in quantum state discrimination, certification, and tomography. However, the sample complexity for their estimation still remains open. In this paper, we solve this problem for pure states. We present a quantum algorithm that estimates the trace distance and square root fidelity between pure states to within additive error varepsilon, given sample access to their identical copies. Our algorithm achieves the optimal sample complexity Θ\(1/varepsilon2\), improving the long-standing folklore O\(1/varepsilon4\). Our algorithm is composed of a samplized phase estimation of the product of two Householder reflections. Notably, an improved (multi-)samplizer for pure states is used as an algorithmic tool in our construction, through which any quantum query algorithm using Q queries to the reflection operator about a pure state |ψrangle can be converted to a δ-close (in the diamond norm) quantum sample algorithm using Θ\(Q2/δ\) samples of |ψrangle. This samplizer for pure states is shown to be optimal.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Trace distance and infidelity (induced by square root fidelity), as basic measures of the closeness of quantum states, are commonly used in quantum state discrimination...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.