Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Quantum computing and persistence in topological data analysis

arXiv
Authors: Casper Gyurik, Alexander Schmidhuber, Robbie King, Vedran Dunjko, Ryu Hayakawa

Year

2024

Paper ID

37562

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

105

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Topological data analysis (TDA) aims to extract noise-robust features from a data set by examining the number and persistence of holes in its topology. We show that a computational problem closely related to a core task in TDA - determining whether a given hole persists across different length scales - is mathsf{BQP}1-hard and contained in mathsf{BQP}. This result implies an exponential quantum speedup for this problem under standard complexity-theoretic assumptions. Our approach relies on encoding the persistence of a hole in a variant of the guided sparse Hamiltonian problem, where the guiding state is constructed from a harmonic representative of the hole.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Topological data analysis (TDA) aims to extract noise-robust features from a data set by examining the number and persistence of holes in its topology.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #37562 #75793 Unitary-orbit classification an... #75792 Global Non-Identifiability of F... #75790 New Methods and Frameworks for ... #75789 Coupled-Layer Codes: Beyond Qua...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.