Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Thermodynamics

Impact of spatial curvature on quantum Otto engines

arXiv
Authors: S. Kourkinejat, A. Mahdifar, E. Amooghorban

Year

2024

Paper ID

37542

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

122

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a quantum Otto cycle with a quantum harmonic oscillator on a circle as its working substance. Since the eigen-energies of this oscillator depend on the curvature of the circle, this model, as an analog model, enables us to investigate the curvature effects of the physical space on properties of quantum heat engines. We assume that two classical hot and cold thermal baths are located at places with different curvatures. We calculate the curvature-dependent work and heat in our Otto cycle with a particular emphasis on how curvature affects it's thermal efficiency. By adjusting the curvature difference between the locations of the thermal baths, we demonstrate that the efficiency of our heat engine can reach the Carnot limit.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Thermodynamics research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In this paper, we consider a quantum Otto cycle with a quantum harmonic oscillator on a circle as its working substance.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #37542 #78815 Finite Quantum Engineering Ther... #78784 Coherence-assisted quantum stat...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.