Quick Navigation

Overview Topics Abstract Importance Paper Tools References Reactions Discussion Publication

Topics

Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations Quantum State Process Tomography

Quantum State Tomography of Four-Level Systems with Noisy Measurements

arXiv
Authors: Artur Czerwinski

Year

2020

Paper ID

375

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

96

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In this article, we investigate the problem of state reconstruction of four-level quantum systems. A realistic scenario is considered with measurement results distorted by random unitary operators. Two frames which define injective measurements are applied and compared. By introducing arbitrary rotations, we can test the performance of the framework versus the amount of experimental noise. The results of numerical simulations are depicted on graphs and discussed. In particular, a class of entangled states is reconstructed. The concurrence is used as a figure of merit in order to quantify how well entanglement is preserved through noisy measurements.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In this article, we investigate the problem of state reconstruction of four-level quantum systems.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Become a member Sign in
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

[1] DOI https://doi.org/arXiv:2101.00016 [2] arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.00016 [3] Publisher https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.00016

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #375

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.