Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Probing quantum anomalous heat flow using mid-circuit measurements

arXiv
Authors: Aabhaas Vineet Mallik, Loris Maria Cangemi, Amikam Levy, Emanuele G. Dalla Torre

Year

2024

Paper ID

37467

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

113

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Gate-based quantum computers are an innovative tool for experimentally studying the core principles of quantum mechanics. This work presents the first observation of quantum anomalous heat flow between two qubits and investigates the role of mid-circuit measurements in this context. Using mid-circuit measurements, we designed quantum circuits that violate the semi-classical heat flow bound, witnessing negativities in the underlying Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability distribution, which indicates the presence of quantum correlations between the subsystems. Mid-circuit measurements, crucial for probing qubits during the experiment, enabled these observations but also introduced disturbances, such as energy leakage, leading to deviations from theoretical predictions. We modeled these noise effects, providing insight into the limitations of current mid-circuit measurement techniques.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Gate-based quantum computers are an innovative tool for experimentally studying the core principles of quantum mechanics.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #37467

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.