Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Towards efficient and secure quantum-classical communication networks
arXiv
Authors: Pei Zeng, Debayan Bandyopadhyay, José A. Méndez Méndez, Nolan Bitner, Alexander Kolar, Michael T. Solomon, F. Joseph Heremans, David D. Awschalom, Liang Jiang, Junyu Liu
Year
2024
Paper ID
37322
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
98
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The rapid advancement of quantum technologies calls for the design and deployment of quantum-safe cryptographic protocols and communication networks. There are two primary approaches to achieving quantum-resistant security: quantum key distribution (QKD) and post-quantum cryptography (PQC). While each offers unique advantages, both have drawbacks in practical implementation. In this work, we introduce the pros and cons of these protocols and explore how they can be combined to achieve a higher level of security and/or improved performance in key distribution. We hope our discussion inspires further research into the design of hybrid cryptographic protocols for quantum-classical communication networks.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The rapid advancement of quantum technologies calls for the design and deployment of quantum-safe cryptographic protocols and communication networks.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.