Quick Navigation
Topics
Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing
Quantum Chemistry
Electron g-factor of strained Ge caused by the SiGe substrate and its dependence on growth directions
arXiv
Authors: K. Imakire, A. Oiwa, Y. Tokura
Year
2024
Paper ID
37317
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
93
Citations
N/A
Abstract
For photon-spin conversion, the Ge hole system in a strained GeSi/Ge quantum well with a diamond structure has attracted significant attention because of the potential for a high-performance spin qubit and optical transitions ranging in telecom bands. We calculated the electron g-factor for strained Ge, analyzing its dependence on both the growth directions ([100], [110], and [111]) and the Ge content of the SiGe substrate using an 8-band model. Our results indicate that the absolute values of the electron g-factor decrease with decreasing Ge content, ranging from approximately -3.0 to -1.4 for all growth directions.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- For photon-spin conversion, the Ge hole system in a strained GeSi/Ge quantum well with a diamond structure has attracted significant attention because of the potential for a...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.