Quick Navigation

Topics

Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing Quantum Chemistry

Electron g-factor of strained Ge caused by the SiGe substrate and its dependence on growth directions

arXiv
Authors: K. Imakire, A. Oiwa, Y. Tokura

Year

2024

Paper ID

37317

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

93

Citations

N/A

Abstract

For photon-spin conversion, the Ge hole system in a strained GeSi/Ge quantum well with a diamond structure has attracted significant attention because of the potential for a high-performance spin qubit and optical transitions ranging in telecom bands. We calculated the electron g-factor for strained Ge, analyzing its dependence on both the growth directions ([100], [110], and [111]) and the Ge content of the SiGe substrate using an 8-band model. Our results indicate that the absolute values of the electron g-factor decrease with decreasing Ge content, ranging from approximately -3.0 to -1.4 for all growth directions.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • For photon-spin conversion, the Ge hole system in a strained GeSi/Ge quantum well with a diamond structure has attracted significant attention because of the potential for a...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #37317 #78837 TLS loss in superconducting res... #78797 Local polarization control of o... #78792 Demonstration of subspace-searc...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.