Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Approximate Counting with Additive Error: Hardness and Optimality
arXiv
Authors: Mason L. Rhodes, Sam Slezak, Anirban Chowdhury, Yiğit Subaşı
Year
2024
Paper ID
37239
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
175
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum counting is the task of determining the dimension of the subspace of states that are accepted by a quantum verifier circuit. It is the quantum analog of counting the number of valid solutions to NP problems - a problem well-studied in theoretical computer science with far-reaching implications in computational complexity. The complexity of solving the class #BQP of quantum counting problems, either exactly or within suitable approximations, is related to the hardness of computing many-body physics quantities arising in algebraic combinatorics. Here, we address the complexity of quantum approximate counting under additive error. First, we show that computing additive approximations to #BQP problems to within an error exponential in the number of witness qubits in the corresponding verifier circuit is as powerful as polynomial-time quantum computation. Next, we show that returning an estimate within error that is any smaller is #BQP-hard. Finally, we show that additive approximations to a restricted class of #BQP problems are equivalent in computational hardness to the class DQC1. Our work parallels results on additively approximating #P and GapP functions.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum counting is the task of determining the dimension of the subspace of states that are accepted by a quantum verifier circuit.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.