Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
Pushing Boundaries: Quantum-Enhanced Leader Election and the Limits of Consensus
arXiv
Authors: Chandrashekar Radhakrishnan, Yuhang Zheng, Olivier Marin
Year
2024
Paper ID
37069
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
98
Citations
N/A
Abstract
This work addresses the complexities involved in designing distributed quantum algorithms, highlighting that quantum entanglement does not bypass the Fischer-Lynch-Paterson (FLP) impossibility theorem in asynchronous networks. Although quantum resources such as entanglement offer potential speedups, the inherent constraints of classical communication remain. We develop a leader election algorithm as a proof of concept, demonstrating how entanglement can enhance efficiency while still contending with asynchronous delays. This algorithm serves as a foundation for a broader blueprint for future distributed quantum algorithms, providing insights into both the real performance gains and the limitations that entanglement offers in a distributed setting.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- This work addresses the complexities involved in designing distributed quantum algorithms, highlighting that quantum entanglement does not bypass the Fischer-Lynch-Paterson...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.