Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
An efficient quantum state verification framework and its application to bosonic systems
arXiv
Authors: Varun Upreti, Ulysse Chabaud
Year
2024
Paper ID
37063
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
160
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Modern quantum devices are highly susceptible to errors, making the verification of their correct operation a critical problem. Usual tomographic methods rapidly become intractable as these devices are scaled up. In this paper, we introduce a general framework for the efficient verification of large quantum systems. Our framework combines robust fidelity witnesses with efficient classical post-processing to implement measurement back-propagation. We demonstrate its usefulness by focusing on the verification of bosonic quantum systems, and developing efficient verification protocols for large classes of target states using the two most common types of Gaussian measurements: homodyne and heterodyne detection. Our protocols are semi-device independent, designed to function with minimal assumptions about the quantum device being tested, and offer practical improvements over previous existing approaches. Overall, our work introduces efficient methods for verifying the correct preparation of complex quantum states, and has consequences for calibrating large quantum devices, witnessing quantum properties, supporting demonstrations of quantum computational speedups and enhancing trust in quantum computations.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Modern quantum devices are highly susceptible to errors, making the verification of their correct operation a critical problem.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.