Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Gravity Relativistic Quantum Information
Nanofabricated torsion pendulums for tabletop gravity experiments
arXiv
Authors: Jack Manley, Charles A. Condos, Zachary Fegley, Gayathrini Premawardhana, Thomas Bsaibes, Jacob M. Taylor, Dalziel J. Wilson, Jon R. Pratt
Year
2026
Paper ID
3704
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
132
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Measurement of mutual gravitation on laboratory scales is an outstanding challenge and a prerequisite to probing theories of quantum gravity. A leading technology in tabletop gravity experiments is the torsion balance, with limitations due to thermal decoherence. Recent demonstrations of lithographically defined suspensions in thin-film silicon nitride with macroscale test masses suggest a path forward, as torsion pendulums dominated by gravitational stiffness may achieve higher mechanical quality factors through dilution of material losses. Here we demonstrate a 250 micron by 5 mm by 1.8 micron torsion fiber supporting 87 grams and forming a Cavendish-style torsion pendulum with tungsten test masses that - to our knowledge - is the largest thin-film silicon-nitride-based oscillator to date. Torsion pendulums with thin-film, nanofabricated suspensions provide a test bed for near-term tabletop experiments probing classical and quantum gravitational interaction between oscillators.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Gravity & Relativistic Quantum Information research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Measurement of mutual gravitation on laboratory scales is an outstanding challenge and a prerequisite to probing theories of quantum gravity.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.