Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Efficiency of optimal control for noisy spin qubits in diamond

arXiv
Authors: Hendry M. Lim, Genko T. Genov, Roberto Sailer, Alfaiz Fahrurrachman, Muhammad A. Majidi, Fedor Jelezko, Ressa S. Said

Year

2024

Paper ID

37020

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

133

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Decoherence is a major challenge for quantum technologies. A way to mitigate its negative impact is by employing quantum optimal control. The decoherence dynamics varies significantly based on the characteristics of the surrounding environment of qubits, consequently affecting the outcome of the control optimization. In this work, we investigate the dependence of the shape of a spin inversion control pulse on the correlation time of the environment noise. Furthermore, we analyze the effects of constraints and optimization options on the optimization outcome and identify a set of strategies that improve the optimization performance. Finally, we present an experimental realization of the numerically-optimized pulses validating the optimization feasibility. Our work serves as a generic yet essential guide to implementing optimal control in the presence of realistic noise, e.g., in nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Decoherence is a major challenge for quantum technologies.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #37020

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.