Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Noise Transfer Approach to GKP Quantum Circuits
arXiv
Authors: Timothy C Ralph, Matthew Winnel, S Nibedita Swain, Ryan J Marshman
Year
2024
Paper ID
37007
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
93
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The choice between the Schroedinger and Heisenberg pictures can significantly impact the computational resources needed to solve a problem, even though they are equivalent formulations of quantum mechanics. Here we present a method for analysing Bosonic quantum circuits based on the Heisenberg picture that allows, under certain conditions, a useful factoring of the evolution into signal and noise contributions, in a similar way as can be done with classical communication systems. We provide examples which suggest this approach may be particular useful in analysing quantum computing systems based on the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) qubits.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The choice between the Schroedinger and Heisenberg pictures can significantly impact the computational resources needed to solve a problem, even though they are equivalent...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.