Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
QSRA: A QPU Scheduling and Resource Allocation Approach for Cloud-Based Quantum Computing
arXiv
Authors: Binhan Lu, Zhaoyun Chen, Yuchun Wu
Year
2024
Paper ID
37005
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
96
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum cloud platforms, which rely on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices, face significant challenges in efficiently managing quantum programs. This paper proposes a QPU Scheduling and Resource Allocation (QSRA) approach to address these challenges. QSRA enhances qubit utilization and reduces turnaround time by adapting CPU scheduling techniques to Quantum Processing Units (QPUs). It incorporates a subroutine for qubit allocation that takes into account qubit quality and connectivity, while also merging multiple quantum programs to further optimize qubit usage. Our evaluation of QSRA against existing methods demonstrates its effectiveness in improving both qubit utilization and turnaround time.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum cloud platforms, which rely on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices, face significant challenges in efficiently managing quantum programs.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.