Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Machine Learning
Low bit-flip rate probabilistic error cancellation
arXiv
Authors: Mathys Rennela, Harold Ollivier
Year
2024
Paper ID
36951
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
158
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Noise remains one of the most significant challenges in the development of reliable and scalable quantum processors. While quantum error correction and mitigation techniques offer potential solutions, they are often limited by the substantial overhead required. To address this, tailored approaches that exploit specific hardware characteristics have emerged. In quantum computing architectures utilizing cat-qubits, the inherent exponential suppression of bit-flip errors can significantly reduce the qubit count needed for effective error correction. In this work, we explore how the unique noise bias of cat-qubits can be harnessed to enhance error mitigation efficiency. Specifically, we demonstrate that the sampling cost associated with probabilistic error cancellation (PEC) methods can be exponentially reduced with the depth of the circuit when gates act on cat-qubits and preserve the noise bias. Similar results also hold for Clifford circuits and Pauli channels. Our error mitigation scheme is benchmarked across various quantum machine learning circuits, showcasing its practical advantages for near-term applications on cat-qubit architectures.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Noise remains one of the most significant challenges in the development of reliable and scalable quantum processors.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.