Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Optimization

Subgradient Method using Quantum Annealing for Inequality-Constrained Binary Optimization Problems

arXiv
Authors: Taisei Takabayashi, Takeru Goto, Masayuki Ohzeki

Year

2024

Paper ID

36916

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

141

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Quantum annealing is a generic solver for combinatorial optimization problems that utilizes quantum fluctuations. Recently, there has been extensive research applying quantum annealers, which are hardware implementations of quantum annealing. Since quantum annealers can only handle quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problems, to solve constrained combinatorial optimization problems using quantum annealers, the constraints must be incorporated into the objective function. One such technique is the Ohzeki method, which employs a Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation to relax equality constraints, and its effectiveness for large-scale problems has been demonstrated numerically. This study applies the Ohzeki method to combinatorial optimization problems with inequality constraints. We show that inequality constraints can be relaxed into a similar objective function through statistical mechanics calculations similar to those for equality constraints. In addition, we evaluate the performance of this method in a typical inequality-constrained combinatorial optimization problem, the quadratic knapsack problem.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #36916 #67313 Digitized Counterdiabatic Quant...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.