Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Optimization
Subgradient Method using Quantum Annealing for Inequality-Constrained Binary Optimization Problems
arXiv
Authors: Taisei Takabayashi, Takeru Goto, Masayuki Ohzeki
Year
2024
Paper ID
36916
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
141
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum annealing is a generic solver for combinatorial optimization problems that utilizes quantum fluctuations. Recently, there has been extensive research applying quantum annealers, which are hardware implementations of quantum annealing. Since quantum annealers can only handle quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problems, to solve constrained combinatorial optimization problems using quantum annealers, the constraints must be incorporated into the objective function. One such technique is the Ohzeki method, which employs a Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation to relax equality constraints, and its effectiveness for large-scale problems has been demonstrated numerically. This study applies the Ohzeki method to combinatorial optimization problems with inequality constraints. We show that inequality constraints can be relaxed into a similar objective function through statistical mechanics calculations similar to those for equality constraints. In addition, we evaluate the performance of this method in a typical inequality-constrained combinatorial optimization problem, the quadratic knapsack problem.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.