Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Almost-quantum correlations violate the isotropy and homogeneity principles in flat space
arXiv
Authors: Akbar Fahmi
Year
2024
Paper ID
36881
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
180
Citations
N/A
Abstract
One of fascinating phenomena of nature is quantum nonlocality, which is observed upon measurements on spacelike entangled systems. However, there are sets of post-quantum models which have stronger correlations than quantum mechanics, wherein instantaneous communication remains impossible. The set of almost quantum correlations is one of post-quantum models which satisfies all kinematic axioms of standard quantum correlations except one, meanwhile they contain correlations slightly stronger than quantum correlations. There arises the natural question whether there is some fundamental principle of nature which can genuinely characterizes quantum correlations. Here, we provide an answer and close this gap by invoking the isotropy and homogeneity principles of the flat space as a conclusive and distinguishing criterion to rule out the almost-quantum correlations model. In particular, to characterize quantum correlations we impose the isotropy and homogeneity symmetry group structure on the almost quantum correlations model and request that the joint probability distributions corresponding to the Born rule remain invariant. We prove that this condition is sufficient (and necessary) to reduce the almost quantum correlations model to quantum mechanics in both bipartite and multipartite systems.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- One of fascinating phenomena of nature is quantum nonlocality, which is observed upon measurements on spacelike entangled systems.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.