Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Classical Verification of Quantum Learning Advantages with Noises
arXiv
Authors: Yinghao Ma, Jiaxi Su, Dong-Ling Deng
Year
2024
Paper ID
36781
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
207
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Classical verification of quantum learning allows classical clients to reliably leverage quantum computing advantages by interacting with untrusted quantum servers. Yet, current quantum devices available in practice suffers from a variety of noises and whether existed classical verification protocols carry over to noisy scenarios remains unclear. Here, we propose an efficient classical error rectification algorithm to reconstruct the noise-free results given by the quantum Fourier sampling circuit with practical constant-level noises. In particular, we prove that the error rectification algorithm can restore the heavy Fourier coefficients by using a small number of noisy samples that scales logarithmically with the problem size. We apply this algorithm to the agnostic parity learning task with uniform input marginal and prove that this task can be accomplished in an efficient way on noisy quantum devices with our algorithm. In addition, we prove that a classical client with access to the random example oracle can verify the agnostic parity learning results from the noisy quantum prover in an efficient way, under the condition that the Fourier coefficients are sparse. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of classical verification of quantum learning advantages with noises, which provide a valuable guide for both theoretical studies and practical applications with current noisy intermediate scale quantum devices.
Paper Tools
Show Paper
arXiv
Publisher
Sign in to cite
Sign in to compare
Sign in to copy DOI
Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.