Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Classical Verification of Quantum Learning Advantages with Noises

arXiv
Authors: Yinghao Ma, Jiaxi Su, Dong-Ling Deng

Year

2024

Paper ID

36781

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

207

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Classical verification of quantum learning allows classical clients to reliably leverage quantum computing advantages by interacting with untrusted quantum servers. Yet, current quantum devices available in practice suffers from a variety of noises and whether existed classical verification protocols carry over to noisy scenarios remains unclear. Here, we propose an efficient classical error rectification algorithm to reconstruct the noise-free results given by the quantum Fourier sampling circuit with practical constant-level noises. In particular, we prove that the error rectification algorithm can restore the heavy Fourier coefficients by using a small number of noisy samples that scales logarithmically with the problem size. We apply this algorithm to the agnostic parity learning task with uniform input marginal and prove that this task can be accomplished in an efficient way on noisy quantum devices with our algorithm. In addition, we prove that a classical client with access to the random example oracle can verify the agnostic parity learning results from the noisy quantum prover in an efficient way, under the condition that the Fourier coefficients are sparse. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of classical verification of quantum learning advantages with noises, which provide a valuable guide for both theoretical studies and practical applications with current noisy intermediate scale quantum devices.

Paper Tools

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #36781 #63359 Confident entanglement detectio... #63357 Optimal nonequilibrium thermome... #63352 Multiplexed telecom-band quantu... #63351 Extending the spin coherence li...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.