Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Non-Locality induces Isometry and Factorisation in Holography

arXiv
Authors: Souvik Banerjee, Johanna Erdmenger, Jonathan Karl

Year

2024

Paper ID

36753

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

103

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In holography, two manifestations of the black hole information paradox are given by the non-isometric nature of the bulk-boundary map and by the factorisation puzzle. By considering time-shifted microstates of the eternal black hole, we demonstrate that both these puzzles may be simultaneously resolved by taking into account non-local quantum corrections that correspond to wormholes arising from state averaging. This is achieved by showing, using a resolvent technique, that the resulting Hilbert space for an eternal black hole in Anti-de Sitter space is finite-dimensional with a discrete energy spectrum. The latter gives rise to a transition to a type I von Neumann algebra.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In holography, two manifestations of the black hole information paradox are given by the non-isometric nature of the bulk-boundary map and by the factorisation puzzle.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #36753 #68472 Non-equilibirum physics of dens... #68468 Error Exponents for Quantum Pac... #68462 Quantum Speed Limit under Calib... #68459 Expanding quantum magnetic field

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.