Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Noise-adapted Quantum Error Correction for Non-Markovian Noise

arXiv
Authors: Debjyoti Biswas, Shrikant Utagi, Prabha Mandayam

Year

2024

Paper ID

36749

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

142

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We consider the problem of quantum error correction (QEC) for non-Markovian noise. Using the well known Petz recovery map, we first show that conditions for approximate QEC can be easily generalized for the case of non-Markovian noise, in the strong coupling regime where the noise map becomes non-completely-positive at intermediate times. While certain approximate QEC schemes are ineffective against quantum non-Markovian noise, in the sense that the fidelity vanishes in finite time, the Petz map adapted to non-Markovian noise uniquely safeguards the code space even at the maximum noise limit. Focusing on the case of non-Markovian amplitude damping noise, we further show that the non-Markovian Petz map also outperforms the standard, stabilizer-based QEC code. Since implementing such a non-Markovian map poses practical challenges, we also construct a Markovian Petz map that achieves similar performance, with only a slight compromise on the fidelity.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We consider the problem of quantum error correction (QEC) for non-Markovian noise.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #36749

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.